1. Home
  2. ›Wave Optics
  3. ›Dye Laser Resonator

Dye Laser Resonator

CW dye jet laser in a two-mirror cavity: TEM₀₀ waist, triplet loss versus flow speed, threshold pump power, small-signal gain, output power and slope efficiency.

Model: Textbook approximation

g₁g₂

0.9604

g₁ = -0.9800, g₂ = -0.9800; stable

TEM₀₀ waist w₀ (in the jet)

30.57 µm

49.50 mm from mirror 1

Gain left after triplet absorption

71.51 %

Effective triplet lifetime τ_eff = 0.2492 µs (τ_T = 0.2500 µs)

Round-trip loss δ

5.056 %

−ln R_OC + 2 × loss per pass

Threshold pump power

0.8233 W

Overlap area π(w₀² + wₚ²)/2 = 2881 µm²

Small-signal gain g₀l

0.09212

Single pass at 3.000 W; threshold δ/2 = 0.02528

Output power

0.6420 W

I_sat = hc/(λσₑτ) = 728.8 kW/cm², near-threshold Rigrod

Slope efficiency

29.49 %

Mode–pump overlap 75.9 %; quantum defect limit λₚ/λ = 90.17 %

Gain cross-section net of triplets: σₑ − σ_T k_ST τ_eff. Triplets made upstream decay while the jet carries them through the mode, so τ_eff = (c√π/(2v)) erfcx(c/(2vτ_T)), c² = (w₀² + wₚ²)/2: τ_T for slow flow, the transit time √(π/8)√(w₀² + wₚ²)/v for fast flow. The pumped jet (pump fully absorbed) gives g₀l = ηₚ(σₑ − σ_T k_ST τ_eff)τPₚλₚ/(hcA), A = π(w₀² + wₚ²)/2, so the jet thickness cancels.

Threshold g₀l = δ/2. Output from Rigrod with the saturation area πw₀²(w₀² + 2wₚ²)/(2(w₀² + wₚ²)), which gives the near-threshold slope overlap w₀²(w₀² + 2wₚ²)/(w₀² + wₚ²)² of Laporta & Brussard (1991): ¾ for matched spots.

Default dye: rhodamine 6G in ethanol. σₑ(590 nm) = 1.1 × 10⁻¹⁶ cm², read off Fig. 6, and τ = 4.2 ns (Falkenstein, Penzkofer & Kaiser 1978); σ_T(590 nm) = 3.7 × 10⁻¹⁷ cm² from ε_T = 9.7 × 10³ M⁻¹cm⁻¹, measured in a 77 K glass (Pavlopoulos & Golich 1988); k_ST = 3.4 × 10⁶ s⁻¹ and τ_T = 0.25 µs in air-saturated ethanol, where dissolved O₂ quenches the triplets (Webb et al. 1970; degassed solutions keep them much longer). Together K_T = k_ST τ_T σ_T/σₑ = 0.29, against 0.35 ± 0.02 measured in a CW laser (Phillion, Kuizenga & Siegman 1974, water with Triton X-100). With air-saturated dye (τ_T ≈ 0.25 µs) oxygen quenching, not flow, clears the triplets, so the flow speed barely matters; degassed dye (τ_T ≈ 10 µs) needs v ≳ wₚ/τ_T.

Output power versus absorbed pump power

00.51.01.50123456Absorbed pump power (W)Output power (W)
  • Output power
  • Operating point

Singlet gain left after triplet absorption versus flow speed (below 0 % no CW lasing)

758085900.200.50125102050100200500Flow speed (m/s)Gain left (%)
  • Gain left after triplet absorption
  • This flow speed

TEM₀₀ beam radius between the mirrors

100200300020406080Position from mirror 1 (mm)Beam radius (µm)
  • TEM₀₀ radius w(z)

Model and references

Textbook approximation. A standard approximation from the literature (for example paraxial, plane-wave or Gaussian-beam), valid within the range the page states. About the tiers

Four-level dye with the pump fully absorbed in a jet at the cavity waist; the Gaussian pump and mode overlap over π(w₀² + wₚ²)/2. Triplets reduce the gain cross-section to σₑ − σ_T k_ST τ_eff; τ_eff = (c√π/(2v)) erfcx(c/(2vτ_T)), c² = (w₀² + wₚ²)/2, is the mode-weighted small-signal triplet lifetime in the flowing jet (derived here; τ_T for slow flow, the transit time for fast flow). Output from Rigrod's homogeneous model with the Laporta–Brussard near-threshold saturation area πw₀²(w₀² + 2wₚ²)/(2(w₀² + wₚ²)), slope overlap ¾ for matched spots. Default dye: rhodamine 6G in ethanol at 590 nm (Falkenstein 1978 σₑ and τ; Pavlopoulos 1988 σ_T, from a 77 K glass; Webb 1970 k_ST and τ_T, air-saturated). Ground-state reabsorption and the gain spectrum are ignored.

  1. Peterson O. G., Tuccio S. A., Snavely B. B. (1970). CW operation of an organic dye solution laser. Appl. Phys. Lett. 17, 245–247. doi:10.1063/1.1653384
  2. Webb J. P., McColgin W. C., Peterson O. G. et al. (1970). Intersystem crossing rate and triplet state lifetime for a lasing dye. J. Chem. Phys. 53, 4227–4229. doi:10.1063/1.1673926
  3. Svelto O. (2010). Principles of Lasers, 5th ed., ch. 6–7. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1302-9
  4. Rigrod W. W. (1965). Saturation effects in high-gain lasers. J. Appl. Phys. 36, 2487–2490. doi:10.1063/1.1714517
  5. Falkenstein W., Penzkofer A., Kaiser W. (1978). Amplified spontaneous emission in rhodamine dyes. Opt. Commun. 27, 151–156. Rh6G in ethanol: σₑ spectrum (Fig. 6), τ_F = 4.2 ± 0.3 ns. doi:10.1016/0030-4018(78)90196-7
  6. Pavlopoulos T. G., Golich D. J. (1988). Triplet extinction coefficients of some laser dyes I. J. Appl. Phys. 64, 521–527. Rh6G ε_T(590 nm) = 9.7 × 10³ M⁻¹cm⁻¹. doi:10.1063/1.341991
  7. Phillion D. W., Kuizenga D. J., Siegman A. E. (1974). Rotational diffusion and triplet state processes in dye laser solutions. J. Chem. Phys. 61, 3828. K_T = 0.35 ± 0.02 at 596 nm. doi:10.1063/1.1682572
  8. Laporta P., Brussard M. (1991). Design criteria for mode size optimization in diode-pumped solid-state lasers. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 27, 2319–2326. Slope overlap (∫s r dV)²/∫s² r dV. doi:10.1109/3.97276
  9. Shayeganrad G. (2012). Optimum design of end-pumped solid-state lasers. In Solid State Laser, InTech, eqs. 10–12. doi:10.5772/38902
  10. Hollberg L. (1990). CW dye lasers. In Dye Laser Principles (Duarte F. J., Hillman L. W., eds.), ch. 5, 185–238. Academic Press. Jet flow and pump-spot regime. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-222700-4.50010-3
Report a problem

A wrong value, a formula, a reference, or a page that misbehaves. The report includes this page and its current inputs.